Showing posts with label Ontario. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ontario. Show all posts

Thursday, 15 November 2012

RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust Announces November 2012 Distribution

TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwire - Nov. 15, 2012) - RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust ("RioCan") (TSX:REI.UN) today announced a distribution of 11.5 cents per unit for the month of November. The distribution will be payable on December 7, 2012 to unitholders of record as at November 30, 2012.

About RioCan

RioCan is Canada's largest real estate investment trust with a total capitalization of approximately $13.9 billion as at September 30, 2012. It owns and manages Canada's largest portfolio of shopping centres with ownership interests in a portfolio of 338 retail properties containing more than 80 million square feet, including 49 grocery anchored and new format retail centres containing 12.4 million square feet in the United States through various joint venture arrangements as at September 30, 2012. RioCan's portfolio also includes 10 properties under development in Canada. For further information, please refer to RioCan's website at www.riocan.com.

Contact Information
RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust
Rags Davloor
Executive Vice President & CFO
(416) 642-3554
www.riocan.com

Source: http://dcnonl.com/nw/32591/re

Wednesday, 14 November 2012

Real estate board says 'no' to land transfer tax

Mayor Hazel McCallion remains adamant that municipalities across Ontario, including the City of Mississauga, need more taxation powers.

McCallion said today at Council that it's no longer feasible to fund all the programs and services the City provides on the back of the property tax.

"We felt very definitively that we cannot sustain the budget on the present property tax," said McCallion.

It's a common refrain from Council as it wrestles with its budget year after year.

McCallion has said new taxes are needed for the municipality or the property tax will bear the brunt of funding an ever-increasing budget.

In October, the City considered asking Queen's Park to give it the ability to implement additional taxes outside the property tax framework. If it happened, the City would have had the option to enact a municipal land transfer tax that would bring in an additional $74 million annually.

No final decision has been made by the City on asking for more powers as Council deferred the matter for further study and public consultation.

However, councillors received a letter from the Mississauga Real Estate Board that said it's not supportive of a municipal land transfer tax and will campaign against any such tax.

The letter pointed to a recent Ipsos Reid poll conducted for the Toronto Real Estate Board that found 77 per cent of 905 residents planning to buy a home in the next couple of years said they're more likely to purchase in the 905 (such as Mississauga) to avoid paying the tax. In Toronto, 74 per cent of residents looking to buy said they'd look to the 905.

"The (MREB), its members and homeowners understand taxation is necessary for quality service, but when poorly designed it can have detrimental and unintended consequences and be unduly burdensome," read the letter, which was signed by MREB president Fawzi Mattar. "Such is the case with a municipal land transfer tax, which we believe will create a drag on economic activity, impact real estate markets and reduce Mississauga's competitiveness."

The MREB also said a recent study by the C.D. Howe Institute found the tax in Toronto has decreased home sales by an average of 16 per cent.

Not all councillors were buying the numbers, though.

Ward 9 Councillor Pat Saito said she supports increasing the municipality's taxation powers and isn't certain of the poll numbers.

"While polls are good, they aren't always accurate," said Saito, adding she believes residents would prefer to have a special tax brought in ahead of hefty increases to the property tax. "Do we like adding taxes on other things? No, of course not. But we cannot ignore any type of (potential) funding."

A land transfer tax is a one-time fee that's charged when property, including land and buildings, is transferred from one owner to another. Typically, the amount is a percentage of the purchase price and is paid by the purchaser.

Ward 1 Councillor Jim Tovey said he's "leery" of the poll numbers and the municipality currently has no other options outside the property tax.

"We need more tools in the toolbox, whatever those tools may be," he said.

He added the federal government must increase its financial support of municipalities.

Meanwhile, McCallion said the Large Urban Mayors' Caucus of Ontario is campaigning to allow municipalities more options when it comes to taxation. She believes a sales tax would be the fairest potential new tax, if the City was granted the power.

During a spirited debate about the matter in October, several councillors, including Ward 4's Frank Dale, Ward 5's Bonnie Crombie and Ward 11's George Carlson, all spoke out against a land transfer tax.

For the original post visit: http://www.mississauga.com/news/article/1536264--real-estate-board-says-no-to-land-transfer-tax

Monday, 12 March 2012

Olive: Canadian real estate prices are falling – not the sky

Everything in moderation.

Recent homebuyers can’t be cheered by forecasts of a looming slump in house prices so soon after paying record prices in what may be the tail end of a 13-year-long Canadian housing boom.

But hold the Prozac.

First, while house prices are widely forecast to soften this year, no one’s expecting a U.S.-style crash of the sort that had prices in overheated markets like Florida, California and Arizona plunging by 70 to 90 per cent between 2007 and 2009.

That cataclysm set off defaults, foreclosures, a Wall Street meltdown, and the global Great Recession. By contrast, expect prices in admittedly overheated Canadian markets – conspicuously the GTA and Vancouver – to ease by 5 per cent to 10 per cent this year. And then to recover and begin making gains over purchase prices in 2013.

There’s an unduly alarmist tone to the latest forecasts of declining Canadian house prices. The headlines give one the impression of an imminent sharp fall.

A recent Maclean’s article linking patterns in Canadian residential real estate activity with record household indebtedness is headlined, “Time to panic about the housing market.”

Even a house fire isn’t something to panic over. You’ll just get in the way of the firefighters.

What we’re actually witnessing is a competent effort by the powers that be to prevent a torrid escalation in property sales and prices. Ottawa has been working on this for two years now, with frequent warnings to Canadians by the Bank of Canada and the federal finance minister to ease up on debt-financed consumer spending, including house purchases.

Mark Carney, the Bank governor, must have conspicuously warned at least half a dozen times over the past 18 months that today’s low interest rates “won’t last forever.” He should know, since he and his Bank colleagues set them. And the Bank has been keeping rates very low – a temptation to over-indulge in credit – in order to spur growth in Ontario’s ailing manufacturing sector.

Commercial banks have joined this coordinated effort to tamp down prices, tightening their lending standards to keep folks who can’t afford to carry a mortgage from attempting to do so. Meanwhile, since January they’ve also been engaged in a price war on mortgage rates that has made house ownership more affordable for existing mortgagees and prospective creditworthy buyers.

That’s the opposite of what U.S., U.K. and Spanish banks did in force-feeding mortgages in the 2000s to millions of buyers with no down payment, no collateral, no or little income, and a poor credit history.

The collateral damage from easing the pain with low interest rates for a Canadian manufacturing heartland that has received repeated blows to the gut since the early 2000s, long before the Great Recession accelerated the layoffs, is that money has arguably been too “cheap” for too long elsewhere in the economy.

That was the mistake, one of the biggest in central banking history, that Alan Greenspan, then chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve Board, made in keeping rates near zero for years after the 9/11 attacks and the mild recession that followed. Which in turn spurred an unprecedented U.S. housing boom that ended in tragedy, with more than eight million Americans abruptly losing their jobs in 2008-10.

It may seem counterintuitive to wish for a slowdown in housing or any other (legal) market.

Yet when you consider that Toronto has in recent years been tied with Atlanta as the fastest-growing city in North America, adding the equivalent of a Calgary to its population every decade, you get a perspective on rising municipal costs that most city councillors and certainly the mayor don’t appreciate.

At 158 structures, Toronto has more skyscrapers and condo towers under construction than any North American city. The three runners-up combined – New York, Chicago and Miami – have 94. Time to apply the brakes.

It isn’t a legacy of wasteful spending that has the GTA in a financial bind. It’s building out municipal services to accommodate so many newcomers.

Cooling-off periods in Toronto property prices have characterized the GTA since the end of the Second World War, making it one of the most stable and lucrative housing markets in the world. What’s happening with prices today is no different. And this has kept Toronto relatively affordable for house buyers even as prices have steadily risen with only brief interruptions over the decades.

All movements go too far. Speaking of which, houses in downtown Detroit have hit rock bottom at $14,000 for a detached three-bedroom. So if the impulse in you to roll the dice on house purchases cannot be denied, think about picking up a six-pack of Motown properties whose price has nowhere to go but up.

Source: http://www.thestar.com/business/article/1144746--olive-canadian-real-estate-prices-are-falling-not-the-sky?bn=1